lemma at confuego.org
Tue Aug 30 02:17:05 PDT 2011
Am 28.08.2011 00:58, schrieb Paul Vojta:
> I've been following the secret service discussion for several months now,
> but have only been lurking until now.
> I've been looking over the proposed specification, and I have encountered
> some places where the wording could be improved. Would you be interested
> in applying such changes? I've attached some sample diffs for Chapters 1-3
> of part I. They do not change the meaning of the spec (except possibly
> where I changed "should" to "must" (line 104), which seems to be closer to
> the intent).
Thanks for your help. I reviewed your modifications and approve.
Unfortunately I can't commit them myself right now as I don't have an
account for the current spec repository.
Can someone else please commit?
More information about the Authentication