[Authentication] Spec review (part 1)

Stef Walter stefw at collabora.co.uk
Wed Feb 9 12:14:41 PST 2011

On 01/30/2011 08:38 PM, Michael Leupold wrote:
>> So this leaves us with either:
>> a) A "Type" property
>> b) An optional "Type" attribute
>> c) A "type" member in the Secret-struct
>> I like a) for its simplicity, b) seems kinda awkward with the only
>> benefit being that you could search/filter items by type, c) seems to
>> be the cleanest solution. It provides consistency as you'd always
>> get/set the actual value and its type in one go. I'd be in favour of
>> c).

How does the attached patch look?



More information about the Authentication mailing list