[Beignet] [PATCH] fix built-in function "fast_normalize"

Zhigang Gong zhigang.gong at linux.intel.com
Tue Oct 29 06:38:00 CET 2013


Ok, then this patch is LGTM. will push latter. thanks.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:30:33AM +0000, Xing, Homer wrote:
> This info is got from the source code of a non-public test case.
> 
> In OpenCL spec, this info is not clearly defined. The spec defines the output of "normalize" but does not define the output of "fast_normalize" when the input is NaN.
> 
> Homer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhigang Gong [mailto:zhigang.gong at linux.intel.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:50 AM
> To: Xing, Homer
> Cc: Lu, Guanqun; beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] [PATCH] fix built-in function "fast_normalize"
> 
> Ok,
> Could you give a pointer to "The input of "Fast_normalize" cannot be NaN."?
> in the opencl spec. Thanks.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +0000, Xing, Homer wrote:
> > No. 
> > 
> > The input of "Fast_normalize" cannot be NaN.
> > 
> > Homer Hsing
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhigang Gong [mailto:zhigang.gong at linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:26 AM
> > To: Xing, Homer
> > Cc: Lu, Guanqun; beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Beignet] [PATCH] fix built-in function "fast_normalize"
> > 
> > Homer,
> > 
> > Do you want to submit a new version of patch to fix this issue? Thanks.
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:49:30AM +0000, Xing, Homer wrote:
> > > I think the same as you. You should assume that if x is NaN, then the result should be a vector full of NaNs.
> > > 
> > > Homer Hsing
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lu, Guanqun
> > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 10:41 AM
> > > To: Xing, Homer; beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: RE: [Beignet] [PATCH] fix built-in function "fast_normalize"
> > > 
> > > hi homer,
> > > 
> > > how about if x is NaN, according to the opencl-1.2 spec.
> > > 
> > >   "normalize ( v ) returns a vector full of NaNs if any element is a NaN."
> > > 
> > > so i would assume that if x is NaN, the result should be NaN. HOw do you think?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --guanqun
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: beignet-bounces+guanqun.lu=intel.com at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > [mailto:beignet-bounces+guanqun.lu=intel.com at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > ]
> > > > On Behalf Of Homer Hsing
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:03 AM
> > > > To: beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] fix built-in function "fast_normalize"
> > > > 
> > > > if the parameter is zero, then return zero if the parameter is 
> > > > positive, then return 1.
> > > > for other cases, return -1.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Homer Hsing <homer.xing at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  backend/src/ocl_stdlib.tmpl.h | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/backend/src/ocl_stdlib.tmpl.h 
> > > > b/backend/src/ocl_stdlib.tmpl.h index a3bf0a0..38d1ab0 100644
> > > > --- a/backend/src/ocl_stdlib.tmpl.h
> > > > +++ b/backend/src/ocl_stdlib.tmpl.h
> > > > @@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float 
> > > > fast_distance(float x, float y) { return length(x-y);  
> > > > INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float
> > > > fast_distance(float2 x, float2 y) { return length(x-y); } 
> > > > INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float fast_distance(float3 x, float3 y) { 
> > > > return length(x-y); }  INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float 
> > > > fast_distance(float4 x,
> > > > float4 y) { return length(x-y); } -INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float 
> > > > fast_normalize(float x) { return 1.f; }
> > > > +INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float fast_normalize(float x) { return x > 0 ? 
> > > > +1.f : (x <
> > > > 0 ? -1.f : 0.f); }
> > > >  INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float2 fast_normalize(float2 x) { return x * 
> > > > rsqrt(dot(x, x)); }  INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float3
> > > > fast_normalize(float3
> > > > x) { return x * rsqrt(dot(x, x)); }  INLINE_OVERLOADABLE float4
> > > > fast_normalize(float4 x) { return x * rsqrt(dot(x, x)); }
> > > > --
> > > > 1.8.3.2
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Beignet mailing list
> > > > Beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Beignet mailing list
> > > Beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
> > _______________________________________________
> > Beignet mailing list
> > Beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
> _______________________________________________
> Beignet mailing list
> Beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet


More information about the Beignet mailing list