<div>On 11/21/06, Daniel Amelang <<a href="mailto:daniel.amelang@gmail.com">daniel.amelang@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 11/21/06, Xan Lopez <<a href="mailto:xan.lopez@gmail.com">xan.lopez@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > In no particular order: > 1) You rock > 2) If no one beats me to it I'll send some numbers to the list tomorrow with > the patches tested on ARM hardware > 3) If you don't get a 770 for Christmas there is no justice in this world :) Thanks, man. Hey, along with adding that torturer-textview patch I sent to this list last week, could you also look into running the timetext.c benchmark that Jorn has here: <a href="http://folks.o-hand.com/jorn/pango-benchmarks/">http://folks.o-hand.com/jorn/pango-benchmarks/</a> and maybe even the built-in cairo-perf test in git? Sorry to nag, it's just that I've been optimizing for all three benchmarks, and it would be really useful to see the effect on all three. The torturer is actually the least helpful for me, as there is a lot of noise from pango/gtk etc, and I'm concentrating on cairo for the moment. </blockquote><div> cairo-perf was on my plans already, but I'll add jorn's benchmarks too. </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Thanks again, Dan Amelang </blockquote></div> Cheers, Xan