Hey, <div>On 11/22/06, Daniel Amelang <<a href="mailto:daniel.amelang@gmail.com">daniel.amelang@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 11/22/06, Xan Lopez <<a href="mailto:xan.lopez@gmail.com">xan.lopez@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > So... > I've not yet setup cairo-perf on the hardware, but using torturer and jorn's > timetext the results look like this: > > Cairo 1.3.2: Drawn label 2708 times. Average time spent drawing (in > seconds): 0.002021 > Cairo 1.3.2 + 3 patches: Drawn label 2716 times. Average time spent drawing > (in seconds): 0.002015 > Cairo 1.3.2 + matrix indentity patch: Drawn label 2696 times. Average time > spent drawing (in seconds): 0.002135 > Cairo 1.3.2 + cairo_lround patch: Drawn label 2703 times. Average time spent > drawing (in seconds): 0.002085 > Cairo 1.3.2 + glyph gstate patch: Drawn label 2693 times. Average time spent > drawing (in seconds): 0.002097 Whoops, you picked up the identity patch instead of the _cairo_matrix_to_pixman_matrix patch :) So the three patches, in order of estimated impact were: 1) _cairo_lround 2) _cairo_gstate_transform_glyphs_for_backend (be sure that you applied my version of this, as I'm pretty sure it's faster than Aivars' and Jorn's) 3) Patch to speedup _cairo_matrix_to_pximan_matrix </blockquote><div> Hrm, I think I applied the patch attached to the first mail in this thread. Granted, I didn't pick the best name for it in my mail, but I think it's the correct one :) </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> > As you can see, the results are so similar that the numbers are not very > meaningfull and any possible win or lose is lost in the noise (I've repeated > all the tests several times, without changes). gtk-theme-torturer seems to > confirm this, as the results are almost completely the same. Yes, that's pretty disappointing, but I'll hold onto the thread of hope that you applied Aivars' or Jorn's version of transform_glyphs, not mine. And maybe that to_pixman patch that you missed will also make a difference. Just leave out the is_identity one for now, to keep the SNR high.</blockquote><div> Well, I'll double check tomorrow, but I think I used your versions because they have your personal 000N- nomenclature :) Let's hope that other people testing or even my own further testing proves the initial impression wrong. And keep the patches coming! </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Thanks! Dan </blockquote></div> Cheers, Xan