So... I've not yet setup cairo-perf on the hardware, but using torturer and jorn's timetext the results look like this: Cairo 1.3.2: Drawn label 2708 times. Average time spent drawing (in seconds): 0.002021 Cairo 1.3.2 + 3 patches: Drawn label 2716 times. Average time spent drawing (in seconds): 0.002015 Cairo 1.3.2 + matrix indentity patch: Drawn label 2696 times. Average time spent drawing (in seconds): 0.002135 Cairo 1.3.2 + cairo_lround patch: Drawn label 2703 times. Average time spent drawing (in seconds): 0.002085 Cairo 1.3.2 + glyph gstate patch: Drawn label 2693 times. Average time spent drawing (in seconds): 0.002097 As you can see, the results are so similar that the numbers are not very meaningfull and any possible win or lose is lost in the noise (I've repeated all the tests several times, without changes). gtk-theme-torturer seems to confirm this, as the results are almost completely the same. I don't think I'll manage to get the cairo-perf numbers today, so if someone can provide them before tomorrow that would be great, I guess they'll be much more meaningfull. Cheers, Xan <div> On 11/21/06, Xan Lopez <<a href="mailto:xan.lopez@gmail.com">xan.lopez@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div>On 11/21/06, Daniel Amelang <<a href="mailto:daniel.amelang@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> daniel.amelang@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 11/21/06, Xan Lopez <<a href="mailto:xan.lopez@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">xan.lopez@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > In no particular order: > 1) You rock > 2) If no one beats me to it I'll send some numbers to the list tomorrow with > the patches tested on ARM hardware > 3) If you don't get a 770 for Christmas there is no justice in this world :) Thanks, man. Hey, along with adding that torturer-textview patch I sent to this list last week, could you also look into running the timetext.c benchmark that Jorn has here: <a href="http://folks.o-hand.com/jorn/pango-benchmarks/" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://folks.o-hand.com/jorn/pango-benchmarks/ </a> and maybe even the built-in cairo-perf test in git? Sorry to nag, it's just that I've been optimizing for all three benchmarks, and it would be really useful to see the effect on all three. The torturer is actually the least helpful for me, as there is a lot of noise from pango/gtk etc, and I'm concentrating on cairo for the moment. </blockquote></div><div> cairo-perf was on my plans already, but I'll add jorn's benchmarks too. </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Thanks again, Dan Amelang </blockquote></div> Cheers, Xan </blockquote></div>