[Clipart] clipart Digest, Vol 75, Issue 16

[Leonardo Cunha]

So the problem is not being sued by that site, but being sued by the one the
clipart really came from, isn't it? The place is definitely not a source we
can trust.

Best regards,
Leonardo Cunha



2010/6/10 John Olsen <johnny_automatic at mac.com>

>
> On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:00 PM, clipart-request at lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:00:50 +1200
> > From: chovynz <chovynz at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Clipart] Possible copyright infringement
> > To: Leonardo Cunha <laobcunha at gmail.com>,     clipart
> >       <clipart at lists.freedesktop.org>, Jon Phillips <jon at rejon.org>
> > Message-ID: <4C100102.30603 at gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >
> > It's stupid for them to say such things.
> > If it's public domain, then it is public domain. They can't put
> > restrictions on public domain like that, because as soon as you put a
> > restriction on, it is no longer public domain.
> >
> >
>
> Before getting too concerned about this site consider what they have there
> - Mickey Mouse, Dr. Seuss, Daffy Duck.  They post clear copyright and
> trademark violations and attempt to CYA by claiming "fair use".  This site
> is not clean.  My concern would be using anything from there because it is
> questionable that is public domain given what else is posted there.  If you
> want them to not be a problem point the Disney lawyers to the Disney
> characters here.  That will put the fear of God into them.
>
> Johnny Automatic
> _______________________________________________
> clipart mailing list
> clipart at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/clipart/attachments/20100611/b3b244d4/attachment.html>