<div>On 2/2/06, Alan Horkan <<a href="mailto:horkana@maths.tcd.ie">horkana@maths.tcd.ie</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Chad Smith wrote: > There have been tools to view SVG in Firefox from at least 0.9, so making Not in official stable builds. Extentensions dont count either, otherwise we might have to consider the feeble efforts from Microsoft as acceptable. </blockquote><div> SO because it leaves room for MS to be anything less than evil it must be wrong? I don't buy that. SVG support from Firefox has been offered here: <a href="http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/windows-all.html#AdobeSVG"> http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/windows-all.html#AdobeSVG</a> and was listed on the plug-ins screen that popped up as soon as you installed Firefox. It's no longer there, since Firefox 1.5 supports SVG natively. </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">> and not a memory hog. And, AFAIK, Opera still isn't open source - it's free Open source or open standards? I know I'd prefer Open Source but experience has shown me that badly documented open source is far inferior implementation is not Open source).</blockquote><div> what does this mean? I don't understand what you are saying. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> It is all very subjective and there is room enough in the wiki for all projects which make the effort to support SVG.</blockquote></div> Which would include Firefox. I have no problem with the Wiki, but if we start listing every good cross-platform open source program on the front page, we will quickly lose focus. -- - Chad Smith <a href="http://www.gimpshop.net/">http://www.gimpshop.net/</a> Because everyone loves free software!