<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Schrijver <<a href="mailto:eric@authoritism.net">eric@authoritism.net</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Firstly, everybody congratulations with the release! ...</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> PS Apologies btw that regarding foss matters my focus is so erratic; I did not get back to these last things about copyright but I did read the other reactions, thanks all! In the specific case the guy did actually alter the license in retrospect, I later found out… <a href="http://www.roysac.com/blog/2008/08/copyleft-vs-public-domain.html" target="_blank">http://www.roysac.com/blog/2008/08/copyleft-vs-public-domain.html</a> Now, that specific case is not so interesting, but it is really interesting to read your reactions on the matter. </blockquote><div> I learned something. This concerns me somewhat. Did you just say public domain things CAN be copyrighted by someone? Public domain is not protected from being copyrighted? I read the blog. I think we might need a legal copyright lawyer to comment. Or maybe just point me in the right direction if one has already answered something like this. </div></div> -- Cheers Chovynz