This is what I see... "Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian as well?" "Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian as well?" "Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian as well?" "Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian as well?" "Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian as well?" "Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian as well?" "Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian be an admin/librarian be an admin/librarian be an admin/librarian be an admin/librarian as well?" My first instinct is to run like hell and not look back. No, I don't want to be an admin or librarian. I'm well aware of what admins and more power/responsibility brings. I just want to upload clipart that should be there. What else would be expected if I said yes? I don't have alot of time and I prefer being "loose". -- Cheers Chovynz <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jon Phillips <<a href="mailto:jon@rejon.org">jon@rejon.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Yes, the anonymous route is fine. I don't have it. Johnny do you? Chovynz, want to be an admin/librarian as well? I'll add you to the system... With great power, comes great responsibility :) Jon 2009/4/1 John Olsen <<a href="mailto:johnny_automatic@mac.com">johnny_automatic@mac.com</a>>: <div><div></div><div class="h5">> We do a lot of things here by consensus. I don't sense one yet. If we > choose the Anonymous route Jon can give you the password. I should be able > to also but I have to find/remember it. > > From Johnny via his iPhone > On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:44 PM, chovynz <<a href="mailto:chovynz@gmail.com">chovynz@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:42 AM, chovynz <<a href="mailto:chovynz@gmail.com">chovynz@gmail.com</a>> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:21 AM, John Olsen <<a href="mailto:johnny_automatic@mac.com">johnny_automatic@mac.com</a>> >> wrote: >>> >>> The old files have been cleaned up and separated into folders by user >>> already - they could be uploaded one by one now, but not under the >>> names of the original submitters as we don't have access to their >>> accounts or they don't have accounts ( we discussed and didn't think >>> it right to make accounts for people who haven't). This is the >>> current issue. >>> >>> Johnny >> >> Should I, Would I, Could I? >> I've asked this several times already and no one has answered it yet. Can >> I take those files, upload them, with original author attribution, and then >> cross them off the list? >> >> The authors themselves seem to have disappeared and this is one way I can >> be useful. I've heard the "we should put them under Anonymous, rather than a >> persons name", but that means it's an admin job - and what admin has time to >> do all that? >> >> I'm inclined to think that if the original authors want it under their >> original name they should upload it themselves. The few people who have >> responded to their stuff under Anonymous havent done anything themselves. >> The important thing (and part of the Roadmap goals) is getting the clip-art >> in in. Currently, I won't do anything until I get permission. I dont want to >> be a hassle more than help, but the facts tell me that the original authors >> aren't really interested in uploading themselves. >> >> So, Can I? >> >> -- >> Cheers >> Chovynz > > I just thought of something. What if I am able(allowed) to log in as > Anonymous then upload them? > > -- > Cheers > Chovynz > </div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________ > clipart mailing list > <a href="mailto:clipart@lists.freedesktop.org">clipart@lists.freedesktop.org</a> > <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart</a> > > </div></div>-- Jon Phillips <a href="http://rejon.org/" target="_blank">http://rejon.org/</a> +1.415.830.3884 (sf/global) +86 132-6817-8381 (china) Sent from Beijing, 11, China </blockquote></div>