<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> How about days? ;) I think the wiki is a good place, it's just that there is lots of info that is old. (Even on LP there is old info - some of the bugs don't even apply to this current version of BETA.) With a good cleanup the wiki can become useful again. (And an Mediawiki update from 1.6.8 to 1.15+, Jon ... Ok I'll get off that broken record!) The Blueprints in LP are relatively clean in comparison to what is available on the wiki and the LP blueprints are in an easy to find place. The wiki IS ... well... it's a wiki! everyone I know uses a wiki. But OCAL's wiki is a scary information bloated place, which hasn't been kept updated, and is discouraging for librarians to keep updating. Perhaps some archiving and updating would be a good thing? It depends how much you want to do and where you want to go with it Jon. Some leadership in that area would be a good thing in my humble opinion. The Roadmap is a different thing to Blueprints I thought. Can you describe your thoughts on the two? As far as I understand Roadmap is what is actually going to happen i.e. a TODO list for those involved to see what is on the table currently, whereas as Blueprint is a suggestion for TODO at an ethereal date sometime in teh distant future. Am I on the right track or do I need a direction shift? Basically, how do you want us to use the tools we have? What is your vision for the Roadmap? Where do you want to go with OCAL? etcetc on big questions. On 12/04/2010 8:47 a.m., Jon Phillips wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:t2zd21bc5f51004111347zf0fd5b1etd152599a3208179f@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <div dir="ltr">Ok, I'm game for trying/using blueprints...if no one says anything in next couple of hours, lets start moving... Maybe I was the only one using the wiki anyway ;) Jon <div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM, chovynz <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:chovynz@gmail.com">chovynz@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I prefer Launchpad. I think the wiki is not a good place for bugtracking/blueprint stuff. Wiki is more for historic/discussion/FAQ/, I feel. However, I won't do anything on that until I hear a consensus. So, sorry. No. Won't do it today. ;) Cheers Chovynz <div> <div class="h5"> On 12/04/2010 8:11 a.m., Jon Phillips wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Heya, we must decide. Are we going to use the launchpad blueprints or the current OpenClipArt wiki? <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openclipart" target="_blank">https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openclipart</a> vs <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://openclipart.org/wiki/roadmap" target="_blank">http://openclipart.org/wiki/roadmap</a> It seems that before we go over to 2.1, we should move completely to one solution. I would like to try the blueprints solution. I think we can get more people helping this way now that we put our bugs up on launchpad. could someone help move over our roadmap to the blueprints? Chovynz? Could we get this done asap today so we can launch in the morning? Jon </blockquote> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </blockquote> </body> </html>