Let's not do quarterly and do the monthly. Also please put the dates down for each month so there are real deadlines. Cool! Jon Phillips us. +1-510-499-0894 cn. +86-134-3957-2035 <a href="http://rejon.org">http://rejon.org</a> <a href="http://fabricatorz.com">http://fabricatorz.com</a> <blockquote type="cite">On May 21, 2010 10:29 AM, "Brad Phillips" <<a href="mailto:brad@bradphillips.org">brad@bradphillips.org</a>> wrote: Yes, I agree that there needs to be time for the theme to be useful. I think the plan (after this initial release) is to start getting the packages out on the 1st of every month, rather than tacking them on at the back end. That makes me wonder about June though..if our incentive is to get packages on the 1st, maybe this initial release should count as the June release. We'll then have a more realistic time frame of putting together the next package, rather than squeezing 2 out in a small space to get on track for releases. I can move all releases back a month (if many agree), June will equal this initial "Spring" theme, July would become a possible combination of Summer/Independence, August would be dedicated to Fall, and so on. I still have questions about the quarterly packaging. Should we encourage new submissions for that as we release new packages, or do they become a gathering of all of the new work obtained in many of these monthly releases? Thoughts? +Brad On May 21, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Greg Bulmash wrote: > Brad, > > Note Jon's previous suggestion to t...</blockquote>