<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> My last email to the list regarding incompatible licences, led me to search for "Creative Commons" and I found these cliparts, that do not have the NC requirement. This is a good thing. BY-SA <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openclipart.org/detail/16102">http://www.openclipart.org/detail/16102</a> (CC-BY) <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openclipart.org/detail/29288">http://www.openclipart.org/detail/29288</a> My Question: These two do not have the no-commercial restriction on them, however they <big>are </big>under a CC licence. Does that licence, even one as open as BY, disqualify it for PD OCAL? I don't know. I need your guys opinions on it. If they are found to be incompatible, then they will be hidden from the library. If they are found to be compatible, then they will stay visible. (Open?) <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openclipart.org/detail/22183">http://www.openclipart.org/detail/22183</a> I think this is significantly NOT the recognised GNU image, so it can be allowed into the Library, Correct? </body> </html>