<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Fair enough. Reasonably well argued.<br>
They are "intended" for adults, as indicated by the words.<br>
<br>
Are you on the Mailing list? <a
href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart">Subscription
page</a> if you want it.<br>
And what is your OCAL username? I'd like to see if I can give you
Librarian status.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Chovynz<br>
<br>
On 14/07/2010 9:45 p.m., Donna Benjamin wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1279100702.29541.2985.camel@gin.mel.cc.com.au"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I don't think they should be censored in anyway - I think we should just
flag the fact they are 'adult' content.
It is a very fine line indeed. If it was a doll, with clothing options
for dressing and undressing, there would be no problem. But these
particular images are of women in sexualised poses. Many workplaces have
very strict policies and most education jurisdictions would object to
this material for young children.
As I said I have no problem with the images, flagging them 'not safe for
work (NSFW)' is a perfect solution. The content remains, unchanged, but
we're not promoting it on the front page - which could cause openclipart
to be banned in schools - which would be a huge shame, as most of the
content is perfectly suitable, and very useful in the classroom.
Yes - I'd be happy to act as Librarian - and tag material I see, or that
was flagged for review by others.
cheers
Donna
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:23 +1200, chovynz wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Should we consider removing the words and changing the descriptions on
cliparts like this? or we leave the words as is and if the uploader uses
words such as these that's when we nsfw them?
(I prefer the second option from a Librarian POV, and the first sounds
like censorship to me.)
On 14/07/2010 6:19 p.m., <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jon@rejon.org">jon@rejon.org</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I think we should be more conservative on the main page, and yes,
striptease and that they are easily undressable.
Jon
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:09 PM, chovynz<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:chovynz@gmail.com"><chovynz@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I'm aware of the clipart, I don't necessarily agree with the decision to
hide them. Was it due to the title and wording only or the fact that they
can be undressed?
What's the way forward with these types of cliparts? Where's the line? Is it
if the title or tags says such things, or is it any clipart that can be
"undressed" irrespective of words?
Cheers
Chovynz
On 14/07/2010 12:08 p.m., Jon Phillips wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">actually, that functionality already is in place. I made the clipart
NSFW and they vanished :)
Donna, you want to help us patrol our clipart? We can make you a librarian
:)
Jon
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Jon Phillips<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jon@rejon.org"><jon@rejon.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">totally, we have this in mind. Bassel, can we make sure that the NSFW
tagged content is not allowed on the main popular images section.
I agree, we should make sure our front page is good for all.
Jon
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Donna Benjamin<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:donna@kattekrab.net"><donna@kattekrab.net></a>
wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hey jon,
I was using openclipart with some teachers in the past few weeks.
There are currently three clips in the popular downloads this month
section
on the front page that could be seen as inapropriate for school
children.
This could result in openclipart being blocked by school networks. That
would suck.
I've got no problem with the images themselves, but wonder if we should
be
thinking about some kind of rating or tagging system that means they
could
be filtered out?
Images in question
Striptease girl (you can undress me!) by rones
Cheerleader (you can undress me!) by rones
Asian girl cosplay by shokunin
What do you think?
Cheers
- Donna
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>