We need to provide metrics for when people help out and treat those contributions with front page respect right? Bassel what are we tracking? +1.510.499.0894 +1.415.830.3884 <blockquote type="cite">On Jul 21, 2010 12:27 PM, "Nathan Eady" <<a href="mailto:eady@galion.lib.oh.us">eady@galion.lib.oh.us</a>> wrote: chovynz <<a href="mailto:chovynz@gmail.com">chovynz@gmail.com</a>> writes: > I'm aware of the clipart, I don't necessarily agree with the ...I think they need to have whatever keywords are necessary to inform people who are deliberately filtering out images that contain nudity in a sexual context (or computer programs that are attempting to do so automatically) that these images match that criterion and should be filtered out. Elementary schools, for instance, might want to provide a clipart collection to their students, and such images would most likely be unwelcome in such a collection. So it needs to be relatively easy to filter them out. In general, I think we could stand to do a lot more editing work on the keywords, to make the collection more searchable, more sortable, and more filterable. Anything that obviously depicts alcohol or tobacco should have an appropriate keyword for that, for example, and currently some of them don't. Many images are hard to find because they lack the words people would use to try to find them. Other keywords appear on virtually every image for no apparent reason, so that it's unnecessarily difficult to find the images that are actually relevant. (Try, for instance, to search for an image of a book, and you'll see what I mean about irrelevant results.) -- Nathan Eady Galion Public Library _______________________________________________ clipart mailing list <a href="mailto:clipart@lists.freedesktop.org">clipart@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart</a> </blockquote>