Nicu is an honourable person I have known several years. Please consider this and write accordingly. If you don't like the license there is nothing to stop you withdrawing your work. <div class="gmail_quote">On 4 July 2013 11:59, Nicu Buculei <<a href="mailto:nicu_gfx@nicubunu.ro" target="_blank">nicu_gfx@nicubunu.ro</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">S.Kemter wrote: > Hi, > > again stop interpreting laws, I told you before there is a difference > between > > impression and attribution, > > I can say "Nicu Buculei is in my opinion to stupid to read licenses and > understand laws" or I can say "Nicu Buculei is to stupid to read licenses > and understand laws". The first one is very clear marked as opinion and > leaves the decision if the message is true or not to the receiver of the > message, the other one is a statement and there cant be made an decission, > because its already made. Don't be so fast throwing insults at me, better have a look at the other replies you received and see they say the same thing as me. Perhaps we aren't all stupid, but you misunderstood the license. > Impression is saying "I worked very hard to collect the clipart" that > leaves the decission if you made them open. Some might think that collect > means you created them some read more carefully. But saying "I worked hard > to create them" is attribution and that right is after CC0 still be owned > by the waiver/creator. > > The whole discussion you started, shows at least to me you are amongst the > people that would read in "collect" - "create" Nope, I fully understand the difference from "collect" and "create", but I also understand we accepted to distribute our works under a license that make this difference irrelevant. We are talking about CC0/PD, not CC-BY. > You way out of line, but you dont get it. You question me after the > acceptance of that term, where did I ever say I dont accept it? I just > told > you that you have to read that term more carefully. That term doesnt deny > me as creator my moral rights or where is it written, that it is allowed > to > SAY that you have created it? Accepting the terms of the site you allowed people to say that. Maybe is our fault we didn't make it clear enough for the contributors, but those are the terms. > For the law is a difference between a lie and not telling the truth. Nobody is lying. -- nicu :: <a href="http://nicubunu.ro" target="_blank">http://nicubunu.ro</a> :: <a href="http://nicubunu.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://nicubunu.blogspot.com</a> _______________________________________________ clipart mailing list <a href="mailto:clipart@lists.freedesktop.org">clipart@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart</a> </blockquote></div> -- Ian<div><pre>Ofqual Accredited <a href="https://theingots.org/community/faq#7.0" target="_blank">IT Qualifications</a></pre><pre>Headline points in the 2014 and 2015 school league tables</pre> <pre><a href="http://www.theINGOTs.org" target="_blank">www.theINGOTs.org</a> +44 (0)1827 305940</pre><pre>The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. </pre></div>