[compiz] Patchs criterias

[Matthias Hopf]

On Jun 26, 06 20:21:15 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
>  >> > If I were you, I'd just branch "officially" and compete.
>  MH> I would suggest to try hard to *not* do that.  Branching has always
>  MH> been the source for problems.
> 
> Tell that Emacs/XEmacs, egcs/gcc or XFree86/X.org X11. :-)

Yes, and all of them have been a PITA, especially emacs/xemacs, because
both are used. The egcs split turned out irrelevant. The X.org split
turned out good, but only because almost all developers switched side.

>  MH> If he were chating as much as others (including me) do, compiz
>  MH> wouldn't be where it is now.
> 
> I'm not talking about chatting. I'm talking about meaningful
> communication. You know the questions I asked (thanks for your mail,
> btw, it was very helpful). Even a link or cut & paste would have been
> enough.

I was refering to general communication as 'chatting', i.e. using other
languages than C. :P

Matthias

-- 
Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de>       __        __   __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg    (_   | |  (_   |__         mat at mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715            __)  |_|  __)  |__  labs   www.mshopf.de