[CREATE] assets library

[Craig Bradney]

> > > > Jon
> > >
> > > silly examples continue:
> > >
> > > <color space="rgb" r="1" g="2" b="3" name="123color" ...
> > > <color space="cmyk" c="4" m="5" y="6" k="7" name="4567color" ...
> > > <color space="hsv" h="8" s="9" v="10" name="8910color" ...
> >
> > This is the best spec I've every seen! JonCruz, what do you think
> > of this easy to use color/swatch spec?
> 
> Why not:
> <space name="rgb">
> <color r="1" b="0.5" c="0.33333" name=... />
> <color r="1.0" b="1.0" c="0.33333" name=... />
> </space>
> 
> After all..it s very much likely that one will have several color s in 
> the same colro space in a single palette.

Also possible... I guess

> Also, what is the advantage of using tag attributes instead of tag 
> contents for the real values?  Aren't we mssing something there?
> Else, xml could all be attributes nand no content... but at elast I do 
> nnot see anything wrong with
> 
> <space name="RGB">
>   <color name="blue"><r>0.0</r><g>0.0</g><b>1.0</b></color>
> </space>
> 
> It might look verborragic..but then...why go XML anyway? 

With a lot of colours defined in a file (and Scribus will include all of the
data in a document file), its getting to be a lot of extra data for no
reason.
Easy for a machine to read, but 7 vs 4 chars per value, per colour, is a lot
of extra info for a human to process if editing by hand (and some people
really want to be able to do this). Content vs attributes - I'm no XML guru
whatsoever.. but still.. all those extra <>/.. ew

Craig