<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:9pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Calle Laakkonen wrote: > On Monday 22 June 2009, Cyrille Berger wrote: > > On Monday 22 June 2009, Calle Laakkonen wrote: > > > ODF seems like an interesting choice, but I'm a little concerned about > > > the ease of implementation. ODF is a huge standard so the desired > > > subset should be defined well. > > > > The <text> element :) > > But should the whole text element be supported? > As I understand, <text> contains heading and paragraph elements, > and the paragraph elements again can contain things like hyperlinks, inline > graphics and others, most of which are simply unnecesasry in image editors. > This also pulls in the style definition elements and their dependencies. > I'd say the only required elements would be <text>, <text:p>, <text:span> > and their associated styles. I don't really see a reason to limit ourself ? (especially since krita is able to save the full extent of the <text> element, and we will want to save all of this) -- Cyrille Berger</body></html>