<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<font face="sans-serif"> </font><br>
<br>
On 05/31/10 14:36, John Haltiwanger wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTimjJM6NShp1XMOaMf4HEeF6svtDtHjdLuHCpP2L@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Graphics doesn't include type</blockquote>
Graphics doesn't include type??? graphic etymologically means writing..<br>
(like photographie = writing with light, choreography = writing with
the choir)<br>
<br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif">Here is some spontaneous brainstorming:<br>
<br>
When i hear <b>art</b> I think dance / sculpture / music / drawing /
cooking / poetry / photo / performance / compsing / architecture /
painting / thinking / playing / acting / directing / writing / comic
strip / singing / rhyming / graphic / reading / installation / film / </font>...<br>
i don't know if you want to cover all that with the foundation..<br>
<br>
When I hear <b>design</b> I think furniture / shoes / software / cars
/ food / sound / garment / industrial / graphic / ...<br>
<br>
When I hear <b>create</b> I think god / fashion / inventing / creature
/
creative commons / making / Haydn / mathematics / chocolate / product /
art / science / new / construction /... <br>
<br>
These terms are not very explicit. Isn't there something more direct?<br>
And I'm a fan of "reclaim your tools" and "libre graphics". (but yes ,
libre is not understandable for non latins..)<br>
<br>
FLOSS & graphics<br>
image and code creators <br>
associating code and image / code & image association<br>
developers & creators association<br>
creating visuals and codes united<br>
...<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
agnez<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>