I think we need some kind of Wiki to keep track of all the name proposals and associated opinions.<br><br>Jake<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:24 PM, John Haltiwanger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john.haltiwanger@gmail.com">john.haltiwanger@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:34 PM, John Haltiwanger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john.haltiwanger@gmail.com" target="_blank">john.haltiwanger@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="gmail_quote"><div><br>Certainly KDE/GNOME/FSF/Blender Foundations support their networks? It seems to me that the distinction between foundation/association you highlight here is a behavioral one and not something intrinsic to the words or the legal structures implied by those words.<br> <br>To me "association" sounds like something that could get blown away by a strong gust of wind. But having said that, I'd prefer to start organizing the nuts and bolts of this structure and so support the adoption of either LGA or LGF.<br> <br></div></div></blockquote></div><div><br>Sorry for replying to myself, but thinking about it a little more I see exactly what you mean Femke. So, while I'm not anti-Foundation, you can consider me pro-Association at this point. Basically I'd like to take back my comment that 'association' sounds flimsy, because I no longer feel this way. <br> </div></div><br> <br>_______________________________________________<br> CREATE mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org">CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create</a><br> <br></blockquote></div><br>