<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> <br> <br> -------- Original Message -------- <table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">Subject: </th> <td>Re: [CREATE] [LGF-LGA] Ok, let's start with a website</td> </tr> <tr> <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">Date: </th> <td>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 11:07:58 -0400</td> </tr> <tr> <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">From: </th> <td>Gregory Pittman <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gpittman@iglou.com"><gpittman@iglou.com></a></td> </tr> <tr> <th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">To: </th> <td><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jon@rejon.org">jon@rejon.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jon@rejon.org"><jon@rejon.org></a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <br> <br> <pre> On 08/08/2010 05:38 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jon@rejon.org">jon@rejon.org</a> wrote: > > Consolidation might not be the solution :) But, I'm all for knowing > when things are end of life. If Create has served its purpose to be a > host, then run towards libre-graphics.org fast and hard. But, don't > worry too much about sunk costs like past websites and consolidation. > Rather, merge what is necessary. > > LGM is great because it has a good focus on culture and creativity, in > addition to development and users. I'm intentionally going back a few layers in the to and fro of the conversation. I think maybe the Create site could work if it had a different/better portal, where what's there now could be accessed from it, but you could have other directions to go from that portal. In essence, I'm just talking about a new front page... Greg </pre> </body> </html>