<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> On 3/21/11 11:28 AM, Camille Bissuel wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:4D872849.5030302@yagraph.org" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> Hi all, I'm certainly not an authority in this field, but willing to change our tools (SVN, mercurial, Drupal or whatever), a few weeks before the event is not really a bright idea in my point of view. We already spent weeks doing the actual LGM2011 website, and even if it's not prefect, it do the job. In the best scenario , trying to restart everything again now will only conduct to a beta quality website two weeks before the event. Furthermore, using a revision control system is not ideal because it increase complexity, and forbid quick testing in the production environment (it's easy to make a typo mistake in a javascript file for example). Drupal is a good CMS, but we will need time to set it up fully, so it will be wiser to use it for next year. Said simply, as already said by a number fo people here, let's focus on next tasks instead of re-doing the same ones again and again. Cheers, Camille </blockquote> Well said.. don't change now.. develop what is there and make it right for 2011. You all liked it for 2010, 9 weeks is no time at all. Having said that though, you should not be doing testing in production, you should have a test environment for that! Using any revision control system could simply allow a checkout of a release version into prod. Adding a CMS on top complicates that, although a database dump from test to prod and a checkout should generally cover it. Craig </body> </html>