[patch] Assorted changes to the mono bindings
hp at redhat.com
Mon Aug 30 20:15:13 PDT 2004
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 18:22 -0500, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> > Is this something exposed to apps or is it "behind the scenes" in mono
> > bindings, e.g. maybe proxies just have a destroy signal when their
> > proxied object vanishes as in glib bindings.
> It is exposed to apps, so apps have to do some work (though luckily not
> very much work) to manage life-cycles properly. There might be a nice
> way to make it all work automagically, but that would probably be
They have to do something like this, right:
- get the base service
- add match rule for ServiceDeleted on it
- when getting that drop any communication with that service
The thing is it'd be nice if the various bindings were consistent... to
me it's nicer if there's an in-process signal on each proxy that is
emitted when the proxied object's connection vanishes.
But I only mean to put this out there fwiw, as a statement of long-term
plan, I'm not trying to say don't commit the patch.
More information about the dbus