John (J5) Palmieri
johnp at redhat.com
Thu Sep 13 13:06:24 PDT 2007
This has worked fine for the bindings so I am happy with git.
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 15:46 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> I had the impression I was the only one "against" moving to git, so
> I told Ryan it was probably fine.
> If anyone is strongly against it then start a discussion about why,
> otherwise we'll give it a try.
> I'd rather avoid a "which revision control system is best" discussion;
> the issue here is whether git will introduce a real problem. i.e.
> let's stipulate that the two choices are CVS or git. If git has fatal
> flaws for people who need to use dbus SCM then we'll just wait for the
> distributed SCM landscape to settle down and stick to CVS in the
>  my actual objection was that none of the lobbyists for git were
> really doing much libdbus/dbus-daemon coding, so I didn't see why I
> should have to learn git. Since Ryan says he will be doing signficant
> coding, and is doing the git migration work, I am willing to try it.
> dbus mailing list
> dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com>
More information about the dbus