ignoring a process' last words: SIGPIPE ...
hp at pobox.com
Thu Mar 27 12:00:39 PDT 2008
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Michael Meeks
<michael.meeks at novell.com> wrote:
> The fix seems at some level sane - though - really we don't want to
> have 2 poll records when 1 is sufficient - and if we could re-factor the
> READ and WRITE polls into a single poll record [ as in ORBit2 ] then we
> wouldn't need 'b)' at all. Also, peripherally, we would avoid a vicious
> 'poll' bug in some 2.4.x kernels.
I don't understand this btw, the poll is:
_dbus_poll (&poll_fd, 1, poll_timeout);
Is that not what you mean by poll record? It's always 1 fd we poll on, right?
More information about the dbus