mzqohf at 0pointer.de
Mon Jun 7 05:50:23 PDT 2010
On Mon, 07.06.10 13:59, Christian Dywan (christian at lanedo.com) wrote:
> I would like to see the negotiation changes and Maybe types in 1.4
> because the current negotiation is completely unflexible. Those
> go intuitively hand in hand I think, so it makes a lot of sense to me,
> in terms of having 2 types to actually make use of the more flexible
> negotiation. That said, if it is clearly voted against, I am also
What is wrong with the current negotiation? It's perfectly streamable
and leaves room open for future addition of negotation arguments. What
do you want?
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
More information about the dbus