Net::DBus and qdbus disagreement
zeuthen at gmail.com
Wed Jan 4 08:54:10 PST 2012
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Simon McVittie
<simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>> In addition to the "portable subset", it's probably also worth
>> pointing out somewhere that it's useful for a D-Bus binding to have
>> facilities for override names.
> This is a good idea (although the relevant bit of dbus-python would need a
> significant redesign before it could deal with that on the service side).
> I'm not sure where we'd say it, though; is there an existing collection of
> advice for implementors, perhaps on the wiki?
I don't think so - I think the closest thing we have right now is the
mailing list archive and various comments in bugzilla bugs.
More information about the dbus