Would it make sense to just have some sort of "include file" facility for /usr/share/dbus/services and let the OS config tools / sysadmins handle the organization?  Best regards, Rudi <div> On 6/13/07, Thiago Macieira <<a href="mailto:thiago@kde.org">thiago@kde.org</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Richard Hughes wrote: >This service name "org.me.test" is then searched for in >the .server files in /usr/share/dbus/services. A typical service file >would look like: I don't agree to that (I assume you're mistaken about .server instead of .service). It's quite important that the system and the session activation files be separate. I'd much rather they were placed in a different directory, but I'll settle for a different extension or a special key in the .service file. The reason for that is that we do NOT want session programs being activated on the system bus by accident. It's very easy for applications that are activated in both to install two files, if necessary. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) <a href="http://macieira.info">macieira.info</a> - thiago (AT) <a href="http://kde.org">kde.org</a>   PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:   E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 _______________________________________________ dbus mailing list <a href="mailto:dbus@lists.freedesktop.org">dbus@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus </a> </blockquote></div> -- Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.