Hi, <div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi, P. Durante wrote: >> And in my program I am doing like: >> DBus::Connection *pconn = DBus::Connection(bus_path); >> pconn->register_connection(); >> >> After this it is working ok. >> >> So I have a question, is there any other way already exist to register the >> connection, or such function is missing and we need to add one as I did >> above? > > Yes, it's a bug, as per the doc: > > "If you open a bus connection with dbus_connection_open() or > dbus_connection_open_private() you will have to dbus_bus_register() > yourself, or make the appropriate registration method calls yourself." > > the constructor should call it and it doesn't, this hasn't come up > earlier because only the 'default' buses were being used. > I don't understand this - the docs you quoted indicate that connection_open() will not register with the bus, which is correct, because a DBusConnection does not have to be a connection to a bus. So having the C++ wrapper for connection_open register isn't right either. dbus_bus_get() does register with the bus, since it knows it's a bus. In C++ I'd expect that to be wrapped separately and as a static or factory method, rather than as a constructor.</blockquote><div>    - I think you are correct. We can make a public method to register the connection      in the bus, and the user should call the register method after creating the connection.     As I tried in the above example.  </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Havoc</blockquote><div> -Br Naveen </div> </div>