<HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content='text/html; charset=windows-1252'> <title>Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle</title> <style> P, td, li {font-family:Arial, arial; font-size:9pt; margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:5px;} body{font-family:Arial, arial; font-size:9pt;}</style> </HEAD><BODY>hi, IDL is a good idea i think it will all the developers & newbies to enter the world of DBUS. deepesh    ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Havoc Pennington<havoc.pennington@gmail.com> Date : May 08, 2009 23:51 (GMT+09:00) Title : Re: IDL language Hi, On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Thiago Macieira <thiago@kde.org> wrote: > While I agree that there should be support for generic annotations, I'd > deciding whether a given method should be asynchronous or not is a decision to > be made per usage, not for all. Very much concur. Sync/async is a binding issue, not an interface issue. It doesn't affect the interface exporter at all. JavaScript bindings don't even support sync calls. Havoc _______________________________________________ dbus mailing list dbus@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus     </BODY></HTML>