<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/11/17 Tor Lillqvist <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tml@iki.fi">tml@iki.fi</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">> yeah I am wondering why "kde" is statically written in the debug message.<br> <br> </div>Ah, OK. I thought the filename visible in that message was where<br> *your* code was. Sorry.<br></blockquote><div>yep <img goomoji="gtalk.328" style="margin: 0pt 0.2ex; vertical-align: middle;" src="cid:gtalk.328@goomoji.gmail"> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im"><br> >> But yes, there is also something called "dbus4win"<br> <br> </div><div class="im">> Ok I will try it, maybe I will get better result with it.<br> <br> </div>Only problem is that, as far as I know, they haven't done any source<br> or binary releases. At least I couldn't find when I was looking. There<br> is a git repository at git://<a href="http://repo.or.cz/dbus4win.git" target="_blank">repo.or.cz/dbus4win.git</a> . The<br> dbus4win-noncetcp branch is what one should use. I was told.<br> <div class="im"><br> > About dbus from <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/windbus/" target="_blank">http://sourceforge.net/projects/windbus/</a><br> > I am facing to a problem that I will try to describe:<br> <br> > - I am creating a desktop using CreateDesktop<br> > (<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682124%28VS.85%29.aspx" target="_blank">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682124%28VS.85%29.aspx</a>)<br> > It's associated with a window station that I am also creating.<br> > In this desktop I am launching the dbus-daemon --system.<br> <br> </div>Hmm, interesting. Are you sure the windbus project is even supposed to<br> support a system dbus on Windows? What do you intend to do with this<br> system dbus? On a modern Linux distro, the system dbus is used by the<br> OS's system daemons etc to inform about system-wide events etc, I<br> think? None of the OS system services / processes in Windows will do<br> anythig with a system dbus. So what is the point? Why desperately<br> trying to use dbus for system level stuff on Windows, when none of the<br> software bundled with the OS will have no interaction with such a<br> system dbus.<br></blockquote><div>same result using dbus-daemon.exe --session so I was trying with --system <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br> (Sure, for communication among apps ported from Linux in a session, a<br> session dbus makes sense on Windows.)<br></blockquote><div>yup <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br> (The above is of course just my opinion.Do tell how I am missing<br> something, if necessary.)<br> <br> Anyway, discussion about windbus and how it works or doesn't might get<br> more insightful replies on the windbus list. If they have one. If the<br> project is still alive. But maybe the windbus people are present here,<br> too.<br></blockquote><div>yup it would be cool if other guys could share their experience about dbus on windows.<br><br>++<br>Julien <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br> --tml<br> </blockquote></div><br>