<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/4.6.6"> </HEAD> <BODY> On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 21:08 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <PRE> On Sun, 29.12.13 23:12, Ted Gould (<A HREF="mailto:ted@gould.cx">ted@gould.cx</A>) wrote: > What I don't see is a kdbus spec that is independent of systemd. It > seems that all the relevant details live in the systemd repository. > Perhaps we could see the spec itself migrated out of the systemd > repository? The software implementation I have been working on will certainly stay in the systemd repository. And right now there is no spec for kdbus, at all, just the terse overview I put together and linked here that is supposed to be basis for discussion. The goal here is to make sure this stuff ends up in the dbus specification maintained on fdo. </PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> Ah, so what you've linked to here you don't believe to be a spec of kdbus. I thought you were saying that those documents were the spec. Hence the confusion. I'd prefer that the KDBus specification be independent of the DBus one so that we can track what dbus-daemon and others are implementing. Ted </BODY> </HTML>