<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">XBMC (<a href="http://xbmc.org">xbmc.org</a>) does use it directly.</span><div>
<font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">(sorry richard, I accidently hit reply instead of reply to all)<br>
</span></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Richard Hughes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hughsient@gmail.com">hughsient@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
This morning I've spent an hour or so renaming internal classes and<br>
most of the filenames we use internally.<br>
<br>
I'm planning to rename the org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Power service<br>
soon ready for the upower rename. I'm intending to keep the<br>
devkit-power-gobject library API and ABI stable at least for a few<br>
months, and ship a new library side-by-side to allow applications to<br>
port during their development cycle, and not to cause pain to the<br>
distros.<br>
<br>
Before I can do this, I need to know if there are any known projects<br>
using the org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Power name directly, i.e. without<br>
using devkit-power-gobject. Thanks.<br>
<br>
Richard.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
devkit-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org">devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>