[patch v2] i915: take struct_mutex lock in intel_setup_overlay()

Dan Carpenter error27 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 19 06:39:01 PDT 2010


This patch never made it into 2.6.35 but it's still valid.  Can you pick
it up for 2.6.36?  It still applies cleanly to 2.6.35-rc3 with fuzz (8
lines offset).

regards,
dan carpenter

On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:58:32AM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I changed the drm_gem_object_unreference() to
> drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked().
> 
> "reg_bo" is a local variable so there are no synchronization issues, but
> the problem is that if struct_mutex isn't held, it triggers a BUG_ON()
> in drm_gem_object_free().
> 
> I also took the "struct_mutex" when calling i915_gem_object_pin().
> The i915_gem_object_pin() function calls i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt()
> which unreferences stuff if we are low on gtt space.  The truth is that 
> if we run out of gtt space on this code path, we're sunk already 
> regardless of the locking.  But we should take the lock anyway for
> consistency and to make the static checkers happy.
> 
> That call tree is:
> i915_gem_object_pin()
>     => i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt()
>         => i915_gem_evict_something()
>             => i915_gem_retire_requests()
>                 => i915_gem_retire_request()
>                     => drm_gem_object_unreference()
> 
> intel_setup_overlay() is always called with "struct_mutex" unlocked.
> There is only one call tree and it is:
> 
> i915_load_modeset_init()
>     => intel_modeset_init()
>            => intel_setup_overlay()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
> ---
> V2:  The code is the same, but the change log is updated.
> No one has complained about hitting the BUG_ON() and I can't tested it
> myself, so this patch is probably linux-next material.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> index 6d524a1..a103582 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> @@ -1347,7 +1347,9 @@ void intel_setup_overlay(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	overlay->reg_bo = to_intel_bo(reg_bo);
>  
>  	if (OVERLAY_NONPHYSICAL(dev)) {
> +		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  		ret = i915_gem_object_pin(reg_bo, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  		if (ret) {
>                          DRM_ERROR("failed to pin overlay register bo\n");
>                          goto out_free_bo;
> @@ -1385,7 +1387,7 @@ void intel_setup_overlay(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	return;
>  
>  out_free_bo:
> -	drm_gem_object_unreference(reg_bo);
> +	drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(reg_bo);
>  out_free:
>  	kfree(overlay);
>  	return;


More information about the dri-devel mailing list