VM lockdep warning
deathsimple at vodafone.de
Sat Apr 21 07:16:23 PDT 2012
On 21.04.2012 16:08, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> 2012/4/21 Christian König<deathsimple at vodafone.de>:
>> Interesting, I'm pretty sure that I haven't touched the locking order of the
>> cs_mutex vs. vm_mutex.
>> Maybe it is just some kind of side effect, going to locking into it anyway.
> It's the using, init path take lock in different order than cs path
Well, could you explain to me why the vm code takes cs mutex in the
It clearly has it's own mutex and it doesn't looks like that it deals
with any cs related data anyway.
More information about the dri-devel