[PATCH] drm/radeon: use a global mutex instead of per vm one

Christian König deathsimple at vodafone.de
Sat Apr 21 09:29:34 PDT 2012


Resolving deadlock problems with the cs_mutex.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h        |    2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c |    1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c   |   25 +++++++++----------------
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index 138b952..f35957d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -680,7 +680,6 @@ struct radeon_vm {
 	u64				pt_gpu_addr;
 	u64				*pt;
 	struct radeon_sa_bo		sa_bo;
-	struct mutex			mutex;
 	/* last fence for cs using this vm */
 	struct radeon_fence		*fence;
 };
@@ -1527,6 +1526,7 @@ struct radeon_device {
 	struct radeon_pm		pm;
 	uint32_t			bios_scratch[RADEON_BIOS_NUM_SCRATCH];
 	struct radeon_mutex		cs_mutex;
+	struct mutex			vm_mutex;
 	struct radeon_wb		wb;
 	struct radeon_dummy_page	dummy_page;
 	bool				gpu_lockup;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index ea7df16..cecb785 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
@@ -725,6 +725,7 @@ int radeon_device_init(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	 * can recall function without having locking issues */
 	radeon_mutex_init(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	radeon_mutex_init(&rdev->ib_pool.mutex);
+	mutex_init(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
 		mutex_init(&rdev->ring[i].mutex);
 	mutex_init(&rdev->dc_hw_i2c_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
index c58a036..1b4933b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
@@ -356,13 +356,13 @@ int radeon_vm_manager_suspend(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 {
 	struct radeon_vm *vm, *tmp;
 
-	radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 	/* unbind all active vm */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(vm, tmp, &rdev->vm_manager.lru_vm, list) {
 		radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
 	}
 	rdev->vm_manager.funcs->fini(rdev);
-	radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 	return radeon_sa_bo_manager_suspend(rdev, &rdev->vm_manager.sa_manager);
 }
 
@@ -476,13 +476,11 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_add(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 	if (last_pfn > vm->last_pfn) {
 		/* grow va space 32M by 32M */
 		unsigned align = ((32 << 20) >> 12) - 1;
-		radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
-		radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 		vm->last_pfn = (last_pfn + align) & ~align;
 	}
 	head = &vm->va;
@@ -498,7 +496,7 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_add(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 				bo, (unsigned)bo_va->soffset, tmp->bo,
 				(unsigned)tmp->soffset, (unsigned)tmp->eoffset);
 			kfree(bo_va);
-			mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
+			mutex_unlock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		last_offset = tmp->eoffset;
@@ -506,7 +504,7 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_add(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	}
 	list_add(&bo_va->vm_list, head);
 	list_add_tail(&bo_va->bo_list, &bo->va);
-	mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -597,13 +595,11 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_rmv(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 	if (bo_va == NULL)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
-	radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 	radeon_vm_bo_update_pte(rdev, vm, bo, NULL);
-	radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 	list_del(&bo_va->vm_list);
-	mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
 	list_del(&bo_va->bo_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 
 	kfree(bo_va);
 	return 0;
@@ -643,11 +639,8 @@ void radeon_vm_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_vm *vm)
 	struct radeon_bo_va *bo_va, *tmp;
 	int r;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
-
-	radeon_mutex_lock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 	radeon_vm_unbind_locked(rdev, vm);
-	radeon_mutex_unlock(&rdev->cs_mutex);
 
 	/* remove all bo */
 	r = radeon_bo_reserve(rdev->ib_pool.sa_manager.bo, false);
@@ -670,5 +663,5 @@ void radeon_vm_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_vm *vm)
 			kfree(bo_va);
 		}
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->vm_mutex);
 }
-- 
1.7.5.4


--------------030900030703060205040108--


More information about the dri-devel mailing list