drm-next update

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Daniel: I've pulled -next from you, I'm hoping that is all you have
>>> for this merge window!
>>
>> Yeah, winding down, no big stuff pending, just a few small
>> bits&pieces. If we'll see an -rc7 release, I'll run another manual QA
>> cycle, otherwise I'll just send you a -fixes pull with it somewhen
>> next week.
>>
>>> I've also merge the polling rework, I'll have to spend a bit of time
>>> testing it I suppose now.
>>
>> I've noticed that you didn't merge "drm: don't unnecessarily enable
>> the polling work" (note there's a v2 follow-up). Anything wrong with
>> it or just overlooked?
>>
>
> I thought I did, a4f968d8e50cb7810e08ebb9bf4c8f2b769fdac7
>
> I applied the wrong one and rebased it out, then got the right one later.

Yeah, missed that one.

>> Also, there's my small series to integrate some of the helper in-line
>> kerneldoc into Laurent DRM DocBook, starting with "drm/doc: Helpers
>> are not a Midlayer!". So of the patches depended upon the dp helper
>> refactor, but now that's merged they should apply.
>
> Okay I'll pick them up.
>
>>
>> Another thing is the clock_monotonic timestamp stuff for
>> pageflips/vblanks. I'll poke Imre about this again, but I guess we'll
>> postpone that for 3.9. Otherwise I don't see anything missing.
>
> I merged this, at least the core stuff. It just seemed like it might
> go somewhere if it was in the tree :-)

Yeah, missed those too. I'll go and harp about updating the i-g-t
testcases now ;-)

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch