[GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC

Dave Airlie airlied at gmail.com
Fri Aug 9 14:28:30 PDT 2013


On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> >> Hi Dave,
>> >>
>> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer)
>> >>
>> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> >> > > Hi Dave,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and
>> >> > > that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream
>> >> > > through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable
>> >> > > branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ?
>> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other
>> >> > > than this set.
>> >> >
>> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes
>> >> > or things with this wrt drm-next?
>> >> >
>> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next?
>> >>
>> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the
>> >> branch on any -rc >= 2.
>> >
>> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine.
>>
>> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other
>> places that have already been solved in drm-next,
>>
>> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point?
>
> As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and pushed the
> result to
>
>         git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du
>
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig           |    7
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile          |   10 -
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c    |  255 +++++++++++++-------------
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h    |   13 -
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c     |  173 +++++++-----------
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h     |   63 +++++-
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c |  202 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h |   49 +++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c   |  187 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h   |   50 +++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c     |  165 ++++++++++--------
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h     |   29 ---
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c |  131 ++++++++++++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h |   25 ++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c |  196 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h |   46 +++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c   |  170 +++++++++---------
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h   |   26 ++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h    |   94 ++++++++--
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c  |   96 ++++++++++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h  |   23 ++
>  b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h  |   69 +++++++
>  b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h     |   34 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c      |  216 -----------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h      |   24 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c       |  149 ----------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h       |   24 --
>  27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-)
>
> Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/
> patches on top of this drm/next/du branch.

Actually small change

Simon can you use

git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-rcar-for-v3.12

as I've merged this tree with an S-o-b on the merge commit, so other
people will know it has gone via me.

Dave.


More information about the dri-devel mailing list