[PATCH 1/2] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)

[Alex Deucher]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 21-01-15 17:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
>> <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> Op 21-01-15 om 11:35 schreef Jammy Zhou:
>>>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcuy,
>>>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
>>>>
>>>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
>>>> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout.
>>>>
>>>> v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0
>>>>
>>>> v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou at amd.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>>>>
>>> Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
>>
>> Dave, Maarten,
>>
>> Do you want to pick these up, or would you rather I pulled them through my tree?
> This goes through Sumit Semwal's tree. He's the dma-buf maintainer and I already made him aware of the patches.


Thanks!

Alex