[PATCH 2/2] drm/dp/mst: fixup handling hotplug on port removal.

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Sep 30 00:30:03 PDT 2015


On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:22:12AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
> 
> output ports should always have a connector, unless
> in the rare case connector allocation fails in the
> driver.
> 
> In this case we only need to teardown the pdt,
> and free the struct, and there is no need to
> send a hotplug msg.
> 
> In the case were we add the port to the destroy
> list we need to send a hotplug if we destroy
> any connectors, so userspace knows to reprobe
> stuff.
> 
> this patch also handles port->connector allocation
> failing which should be a rare event, but makes
> the code consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 87112d3..d11052c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -863,29 +863,33 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_port(struct kref *kref)
>  {
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port = container_of(kref, struct drm_dp_mst_port, kref);
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = port->mgr;
> +
>  	if (!port->input) {
>  		port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
>  
>  		kfree(port->cached_edid);
>  
> -		/* we can't destroy the connector here, as
> -		   we might be holding the mode_config.mutex
> -		   from an EDID retrieval */
> +		/*
> +		 * The only time we don't have a connector
> +		 * on an output port is if the connector init
> +		 * fails.
> +		 */
>  		if (port->connector) {
> +			/* we can't destroy the connector here, as
> +			 * we might be holding the mode_config.mutex
> +			 * from an EDID retrieval */
> +
>  			mutex_lock(&mgr->destroy_connector_lock);
>  			list_add(&port->next, &mgr->destroy_connector_list);
>  			mutex_unlock(&mgr->destroy_connector_lock);
>  			schedule_work(&mgr->destroy_connector_work);
>  			return;
>  		}
> +		/* no need to clean up vcpi
> +		 * as if we have no connector we never setup a vcpi */
>  		drm_dp_port_teardown_pdt(port, port->pdt);
> -
> -		if (!port->input && port->vcpi.vcpi > 0)
> -			drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi);
>  	}
>  	kfree(port);
> -
> -	(*mgr->cbs->hotplug)(mgr);
>  }
>  
>  static void drm_dp_put_port(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
> @@ -1116,12 +1120,21 @@ static void drm_dp_add_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
>  
>  		build_mst_prop_path(mstb, port->port_num, proppath, sizeof(proppath));
>  		port->connector = (*mstb->mgr->cbs->add_connector)(mstb->mgr, port, proppath);
> -
> +		if (!port->connector) {
> +			/* remove it from the port list */
> +			mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->lock);
> +			list_del(&port->next);
> +			mutex_unlock(&mstb->mgr->lock);
> +			/* drop port list reference */
> +			drm_dp_put_port(port);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
>  		if (port->port_num >= 8) {
>  			port->cached_edid = drm_get_edid(port->connector, &port->aux.ddc);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +out:
>  	/* put reference to this port */
>  	drm_dp_put_port(port);
>  }
> @@ -2672,7 +2685,7 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_connector_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = container_of(work, struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr, destroy_connector_work);
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> -
> +	bool send_hotplug = false;
>  	/*
>  	 * Not a regular list traverse as we have to drop the destroy
>  	 * connector lock before destroying the connector, to avoid AB->BA
> @@ -2695,7 +2708,10 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_connector_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		if (!port->input && port->vcpi.vcpi > 0)
>  			drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi);
>  		kfree(port);
> +		send_hotplug = true;
>  	}
> +	if (send_hotplug)
> +		(*mgr->cbs->hotplug)(mgr);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.4.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the dri-devel mailing list