vmwgfx leaking bo pins?

Thomas Hellström (Intel) thomas_os at shipmail.org
Fri Mar 12 10:06:20 UTC 2021


On 3/12/21 12:02 AM, Zack Rusin wrote:
>
>> On Mar 11, 2021, at 17:35, Thomas Hellström (Intel) <thomas_os at shipmail.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Zack
>>
>> On 3/11/21 10:07 PM, Zack Rusin wrote:
>>>> On Mar 11, 2021, at 05:46, Thomas Hellström (Intel) <thomas_os at shipmail.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I tried latest drm-fixes today and saw a lot of these: Fallout from ttm rework?
>>> Yes, I fixed this in d1a73c641afd2617bd80bce8b71a096fc5b74b7e it was in drm-misc-next in the drm-misc tree for a while but hasn’t been merged for 5.12.
>>>
>>> z
>>>
>> Hmm, yes but doesn't that fix trip the ttm_bo_unpin() dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv)?
> No, doesn’t seem to. TBH I’m not sure why myself, but it seems to be working fine.
>
>
With CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y I see this:

[    7.117145] [drm] FIFO at 0x00000000fe000000 size is 8192 kiB
[    7.117284] [drm] VRAM at 0x00000000e8000000 size is 131072 kiB
[    7.117291] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[    7.117295] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[    7.117298] turning off the locking correctness validator

Which will probably mask that dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv)

/Thomas




More information about the dri-devel mailing list