[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use dma_resv_iter for waiting in i915_gem_object_wait_reservation.
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Oct 13 14:00:59 UTC 2021
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:32:03PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> No memory should be allocated when calling i915_gem_object_wait,
> because it may be called to idle a BO when evicting memory.
>
> Fix this by using dma_resv_iter helpers to call
> i915_gem_object_wait_fence() on each fence, which cleans up the code a lot.
> Also remove dma_resv_prune, it's questionably.
>
> This will result in the following lockdep splat.
>
> <4> [83.538517] ======================================================
> <4> [83.538520] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> <4> [83.538522] 5.15.0-rc5-CI-Trybot_8062+ #1 Not tainted
> <4> [83.538525] ------------------------------------------------------
> <4> [83.538527] gem_render_line/5242 is trying to acquire lock:
> <4> [83.538530] ffffffff8275b1e0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc_track_caller+0x56/0x270
> <4> [83.538538]
> but task is already holding lock:
> <4> [83.538540] ffff88813471d1e0 (&vm->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin_ww+0x1c7/0x970 [i915]
> <4> [83.538638]
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> <4> [83.538642]
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> <4> [83.538645]
> -> #1 (&vm->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> <4> [83.538649] lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
> <4> [83.538654] i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex+0x2d/0x50 [i915]
> <4> [83.538730] i915_address_space_init+0xf5/0x1b0 [i915]
> <4> [83.538794] ppgtt_init+0x55/0x70 [i915]
> <4> [83.538856] gen8_ppgtt_create+0x44/0x5d0 [i915]
> <4> [83.538912] i915_ppgtt_create+0x28/0xf0 [i915]
> <4> [83.538971] intel_gt_init+0x130/0x3b0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539029] i915_gem_init+0x14b/0x220 [i915]
> <4> [83.539100] i915_driver_probe+0x97e/0xdd0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539149] i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1d0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539197] pci_device_probe+0x9b/0x110
> <4> [83.539201] really_probe+0x1b0/0x3b0
> <4> [83.539205] __driver_probe_device+0xf6/0x170
> <4> [83.539208] driver_probe_device+0x1a/0x90
> <4> [83.539210] __driver_attach+0x93/0x160
> <4> [83.539213] bus_for_each_dev+0x72/0xc0
> <4> [83.539216] bus_add_driver+0x14b/0x1f0
> <4> [83.539220] driver_register+0x66/0xb0
> <4> [83.539222] hdmi_get_spk_alloc+0x1f/0x50 [snd_hda_codec_hdmi]
> <4> [83.539227] do_one_initcall+0x53/0x2e0
> <4> [83.539230] do_init_module+0x55/0x200
> <4> [83.539234] load_module+0x2700/0x2980
> <4> [83.539237] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110
> <4> [83.539241] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0
> <4> [83.539244] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> <4> [83.539247]
> -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
> <4> [83.539251] validate_chain+0xb37/0x1e70
> <4> [83.539254] __lock_acquire+0x5a1/0xb70
> <4> [83.539258] lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
> <4> [83.539260] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x9d/0xd0
> <4> [83.539264] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x56/0x270
> <4> [83.539267] krealloc+0x48/0xa0
> <4> [83.539270] dma_resv_get_fences+0x1c3/0x280
> <4> [83.539274] i915_gem_object_wait+0x1ff/0x410 [i915]
> <4> [83.539342] i915_gem_evict_for_node+0x16b/0x440 [i915]
> <4> [83.539412] i915_gem_gtt_reserve+0xff/0x130 [i915]
> <4> [83.539482] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x765/0x970 [i915]
> <4> [83.539556] eb_validate_vmas+0x6fe/0x8e0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539626] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x9a6/0x20a0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539693] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x2c0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539759] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xac/0x140
> <4> [83.539763] drm_ioctl+0x201/0x3d0
> <4> [83.539766] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
> <4> [83.539769] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0
> <4> [83.539772] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> <4> [83.539775]
> other info that might help us debug this:
> <4> [83.539778] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> <4> [83.539781] CPU0 CPU1
> <4> [83.539783] ---- ----
> <4> [83.539785] lock(&vm->mutex/1);
> <4> [83.539788] lock(fs_reclaim);
> <4> [83.539791] lock(&vm->mutex/1);
> <4> [83.539794] lock(fs_reclaim);
> <4> [83.539796]
> *** DEADLOCK ***
> <4> [83.539799] 3 locks held by gem_render_line/5242:
> <4> [83.539802] #0: ffffc90000d4bbf0 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x8e5/0x20a0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539870] #1: ffff88811e48bae8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: eb_validate_vmas+0x81/0x8e0 [i915]
> <4> [83.539936] #2: ffff88813471d1e0 (&vm->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin_ww+0x1c7/0x970 [i915]
> <4> [83.540011]
> stack backtrace:
> <4> [83.540014] CPU: 2 PID: 5242 Comm: gem_render_line Not tainted 5.15.0-rc5-CI-Trybot_8062+ #1
> <4> [83.540019] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC11TNHi3/NUC11TNBi3, BIOS TNTGL357.0038.2020.1124.1648 11/24/2020
> <4> [83.540023] Call Trace:
> <4> [83.540026] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x7b
> <4> [83.540030] check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150
> <4> [83.540034] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x50/0x60
> <4> [83.540038] validate_chain+0xb37/0x1e70
> <4> [83.540042] __lock_acquire+0x5a1/0xb70
> <4> [83.540046] lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
> <4> [83.540049] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x56/0x270
> <4> [83.540052] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
> <4> [83.540055] ? dma_resv_get_fences+0x1c3/0x280
> <4> [83.540058] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x9d/0xd0
> <4> [83.540061] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x56/0x270
> <4> [83.540064] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x56/0x270
> <4> [83.540067] krealloc+0x48/0xa0
> <4> [83.540070] dma_resv_get_fences+0x1c3/0x280
> <4> [83.540074] i915_gem_object_wait+0x1ff/0x410 [i915]
> <4> [83.540143] i915_gem_evict_for_node+0x16b/0x440 [i915]
> <4> [83.540212] i915_gem_gtt_reserve+0xff/0x130 [i915]
> <4> [83.540281] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x765/0x970 [i915]
> <4> [83.540354] eb_validate_vmas+0x6fe/0x8e0 [i915]
> <4> [83.540420] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x9a6/0x20a0 [i915]
> <4> [83.540485] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbf/0x130
> <4> [83.540490] ? __lock_acquire+0x5c0/0xb70
> <4> [83.540495] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x2c0 [i915]
> <4> [83.540559] ? i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x20a0/0x20a0 [i915]
> <4> [83.540622] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xac/0x140
> <4> [83.540625] drm_ioctl+0x201/0x3d0
> <4> [83.540628] ? i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x20a0/0x20a0 [i915]
> <4> [83.540691] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
> <4> [83.540694] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0
> <4> [83.540697] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> <4> [83.540700] RIP: 0033:0x7fc314edc50b
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Yay for ditching i915/dma_resv_utils.c while we're at it!
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.c | 17 ------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.h | 13 -----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 56 +++-----------------
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> index 21b05ed0e4e8..88bb326d9031 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ i915-y += i915_drv.o \
>
> # core library code
> i915-y += \
> - dma_resv_utils.o \
> i915_memcpy.o \
> i915_mm.o \
> i915_sw_fence.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 7df91b7e4ca8..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> -/*
> - * Copyright © 2020 Intel Corporation
> - */
> -
> -#include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> -
> -#include "dma_resv_utils.h"
> -
> -void dma_resv_prune(struct dma_resv *resv)
> -{
> - if (dma_resv_trylock(resv)) {
> - if (dma_resv_test_signaled(resv, true))
> - dma_resv_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
> - dma_resv_unlock(resv);
> - }
> -}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index b9d8fb5f8367..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dma_resv_utils.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> -/*
> - * Copyright © 2020 Intel Corporation
> - */
> -
> -#ifndef DMA_RESV_UTILS_H
> -#define DMA_RESV_UTILS_H
> -
> -struct dma_resv;
> -
> -void dma_resv_prune(struct dma_resv *resv);
> -
> -#endif /* DMA_RESV_UTILS_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> index c80e6c1d2bcb..5375f3f9f016 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
>
> #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
>
> -#include "dma_resv_utils.h"
> #include "i915_trace.h"
>
> static bool swap_available(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> index f909aaa09d9c..e59304a76b2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>
> #include "gt/intel_engine.h"
>
> -#include "dma_resv_utils.h"
> #include "i915_gem_ioctls.h"
> #include "i915_gem_object.h"
>
> @@ -37,56 +36,17 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct dma_resv *resv,
> unsigned int flags,
> long timeout)
> {
> - struct dma_fence *excl;
> - bool prune_fences = false;
> -
> - if (flags & I915_WAIT_ALL) {
> - struct dma_fence **shared;
> - unsigned int count, i;
> - int ret;
> + struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
> + struct dma_fence *fence;
>
> - ret = dma_resv_get_fences(resv, &excl, &count, &shared);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> - timeout = i915_gem_object_wait_fence(shared[i],
> - flags, timeout);
> - if (timeout < 0)
> - break;
> + dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, resv, flags & I915_WAIT_ALL);
> + dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
>
> - dma_fence_put(shared[i]);
> - }
> -
> - for (; i < count; i++)
> - dma_fence_put(shared[i]);
> - kfree(shared);
> -
> - /*
> - * If both shared fences and an exclusive fence exist,
> - * then by construction the shared fences must be later
> - * than the exclusive fence. If we successfully wait for
> - * all the shared fences, we know that the exclusive fence
> - * must all be signaled. If all the shared fences are
> - * signaled, we can prune the array and recover the
> - * floating references on the fences/requests.
> - */
> - prune_fences = count && timeout >= 0;
> - } else {
> - excl = dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked(resv);
> + timeout = i915_gem_object_wait_fence(fence, flags, timeout);
> + if (timeout <= 0)
> + break;
> }
> -
> - if (excl && timeout >= 0)
> - timeout = i915_gem_object_wait_fence(excl, flags, timeout);
> -
> - dma_fence_put(excl);
> -
> - /*
> - * Opportunistically prune the fences iff we know they have *all* been
> - * signaled.
> - */
> - if (prune_fences)
> - dma_resv_prune(resv);
> + dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
>
> return timeout;
> }
> --
> 2.33.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list