[PATCH] drm/display: drop unexpected word "the" in the comments

[Lyude Paul]

Actually I hate to ask but could you resend this and the other patch that you
sent and make sure that dri-devel@ is explicitly in the to: list? For some
reason these patches don't seem to be coming up on patchwork

On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 13:54 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> 
> Will push to the appropriate branch in a moment
> 
> On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 21:14 +0800, Jiang Jian wrote:
> > there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be dropped
> > 
> > file: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > line: 1600
> >   * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> > changed to
> >   * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <jiangjian at cdjrlc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index e7c22c2ca90c..499f75768523 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static int drm_dp_aux_reply_duration(const struct
> > drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >   * Calculate the length of the i2c transfer in usec, assuming
> >   * the i2c bus speed is as specified. Gives the the "worst"
> >   * case estimate, ie. successful while as long as possible.
> > - * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> > + * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> >   * message includes a START, ADDRESS and STOP. Neither does it
> >   * account for additional random variables such as clock stretching.
> >   */
> 

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat