[PATCH V2] drivers: gpu: drm: vmwgfx: fixed typos

[Randy Dunlap]

Hi--

On 12/14/23 22:01, Ghanshyam Agrawal wrote:
> Fixed multiple typos in vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Agrawal <ghanshyam1898 at gmail.com>
> ---
> V2:
> Fixed some more typos suggested by codespell
> and the community.
> 
> V1:
> Fixed multiple typos
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> index 36987ef3fc30..76aa72e8be73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct vmw_ctx_validation_info {
>   * @func: Call-back to handle the command.
>   * @user_allow: Whether allowed from the execbuf ioctl.
>   * @gb_disable: Whether disabled if guest-backed objects are available.
> - * @gb_enable: Whether enabled iff guest-backed objects are available.
> + * @gb_enable: Whether enabled if guest-backed objects are available.

"iff" normally means "if and only if" and its use in the kernel sources is
usually not a mistake. However, this one sounds dodgy to me (before your change),
so it's OK IMO. Also, the line above it uses "if" for a similar comment.

Maybe someone else knows better.

>   * @cmd_name: Name of the command.
>   */
>  struct vmw_cmd_entry {
> @@ -621,10 +621,10 @@ static int vmw_resources_reserve(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context)
>   * @sw_context: Pointer to the software context.
>   * @res_type: Resource type.
>   * @dirty: Whether to change dirty status.
> - * @converter: User-space visisble type specific information.
> + * @converter: User-space visible type specific information.
>   * @id_loc: Pointer to the location in the command buffer currently being parsed
>   * from where the user-space resource id handle is located.
> - * @p_res: Pointer to pointer to resource validalidation node. Populated on
> + * @p_res: Pointer to pointer to resource validation node. Populated on
>   * exit.
>   */
>  static int
> @@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ static int vmw_query_bo_switch_prepare(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
>   * object following that query wait has signaled, we are sure that all preceding
>   * queries have finished, and the old query buffer can be unpinned. However,
>   * since both the new query buffer and the old one are fenced with that fence,
> - * we can do an asynchronus unpin now, and be sure that the old query buffer
> + * we can do an asynchronous unpin now, and be sure that the old query buffer
>   * won't be moved until the fence has signaled.
>   *
>   * As mentioned above, both the new - and old query buffers need to be fenced

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>

thanks.

-- 
#Randy
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html