[v1 1/2] drm/panel: ili9882t: Break out as separate driver
Doug Anderson
dianders at google.com
Mon Oct 9 20:44:18 UTC 2023
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 11:07 PM Cong Yang
<yangcong5 at huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
>
> The Starry ILI9882t-based panel should never have been part of the boe
> tv101wum driver, it is clearly based on the Ilitek ILI9882t display
> controller and if you look at the custom command sequences for the
> panel these clearly contain the signature Ilitek page switch (0xff)
> commands. The hardware has nothing in common with the other panels
> supported by this driver.
>
> Break this out into a separate driver and config symbol instead.
>
> If the placement here is out of convenience for using similar code,
> we should consider creating a helper library instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Yang <yangcong5 at huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 +
> .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6.c | 371 ---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9882t.c | 752 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 762 insertions(+), 371 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9882t.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> index ecb22ea326cb..99e14dc212ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
> @@ -203,6 +203,15 @@ config DRM_PANEL_ILITEK_ILI9881C
> Say Y if you want to enable support for panels based on the
> Ilitek ILI9881c controller.
>
> +config DRM_PANEL_ILITEK_ILI9882T
> + tristate "Ilitek ILI9882t-based panels"
> + depends on OF
> + depends on DRM_MIPI_DSI
> + depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
> + help
> + Say Y if you want to enable support for panels based on the
> + Ilitek ILI9882t controller.
We'll of course run into the same problem we always run into when
Kconfig symbols get renamed or broken apart: people will have to know
to update their configs to include this. Not much we can do about it,
though. :-/ optional: I guess you could theoretically also include an
extra patch in your series to 'arch/arm64/configs/defconfig' enabling
this new config, since the old panel was enabled there...
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9882t.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9882t.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bbfcffe65623
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9882t.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,752 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Panels based on the Ilitek ILI9882T display controller.
> + */
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_connector.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> +
> +#include <video/mipi_display.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Use this descriptor struct to describe different panels using the
> + * Ilitek ILI9882T display controller.
> + */
> +struct panel_desc {
> + const struct drm_display_mode *modes;
> + unsigned int bpc;
> +
> + /**
> + * @width_mm: width of the panel's active display area
> + * @height_mm: height of the panel's active display area
> + */
> + struct {
> + unsigned int width_mm;
> + unsigned int height_mm;
> + } size;
> +
> + unsigned long mode_flags;
> + enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
> + const struct panel_init_cmd *init_cmds;
> + unsigned int init_cmd_length;
Why do you need 'init_cmd_length'? It seems like an arbitrary
difference between the two drivers. Your 'panel_init_cmd' in the new
driver still ends with a 0-length command so just use that so you
don't need to store the length.
> +/* ILI9882-specific commands, add new commands as you decode them */
> +#define ILI9882T_DCS_SWITCH_PAGE 0xFF
> +
> +static const struct panel_init_cmd starry_ili9882t_init_cmd[] = {
> + _INIT_DELAY_CMD(5),
> + _INIT_DCS_CMD(ILI9882T_DCS_SWITCH_PAGE, 0x98, 0x82, 0x01),
Slightly cleaner, can you do:
#define _INIT_SWITCH_PAGE_CMD(page) \
_INIT_DCS_CMD(ILI9882T_DCS_SWITCH_PAGE, 0x98, 0x82, (page))
Then in your array you can use stuff like
_INIT_SWITCH_PAGE_CMD(0x01);
> +static int ili9882t_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> +{
> + struct ili9882t *ili = to_ili9882t(panel);
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ili->dsi;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + gpiod_set_value(ili->enable_gpio, 0);
> + usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(ili->pp3300);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(ili->pp1800);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + usleep_range(3000, 5000);
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(ili->avdd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto poweroff1v8;
> + ret = regulator_enable(ili->avee);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto poweroffavdd;
> +
> + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> +
> + // MIPI needs to keep the LP11 state before the lcm_reset pin is pulled high
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_nop(ili->dsi);
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> +
> + gpiod_set_value(ili->enable_gpio, 1);
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> + gpiod_set_value(ili->enable_gpio, 0);
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> + gpiod_set_value(ili->enable_gpio, 1);
> + usleep_range(6000, 10000);
> +
> + for(i = 0; i < ili->desc->init_cmd_length; i++) {
> + const struct panel_init_cmd *cmd = &ili->desc->init_cmds[i];
> + switch (cmd->type) {
> + case DELAY_CMD:
> + msleep(cmd->data[0]);
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
> +
> + case INIT_DCS_CMD:
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi, cmd->data[0],
> + cmd->len <= 1 ? NULL :
> + &cmd->data[1],
> + cmd->len - 1);
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(panel->dev,
> + "failed to write command %u\n", i);
> + goto poweroff;
> + }
> + }
In the boe driver the above is in a sub-function
boe_panel_init_dcs_cmd(). Can you create a similar sub-function for
the ili9882t driver? It seems like a nice logical thing to break out
and nice not to have arbitrary differences between the two drivers
since they're so similar...
> +static const struct panel_desc starry_ili9882t_desc = {
> + .modes = &starry_ili9882t_default_mode,
> + .bpc = 8,
> + .size = {
> + .width_mm = 141,
> + .height_mm = 226,
> + },
> + .lanes = 4,
> + .format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888,
> + .mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE |
> + MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM,
nit: please fix indentation of the line above.
> + .init_cmds = starry_ili9882t_init_cmd,
> + .init_cmd_length = ARRAY_SIZE(starry_ili9882t_init_cmd),
> +};
> +
> +static int ili9882t_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel,
> + struct drm_connector *connector)
nit: please fix indentation of the line above.
> +static int ili9882t_add(struct ili9882t *ili)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &ili->dsi->dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + ili->avdd = devm_regulator_get(dev, "avdd");
> + if (IS_ERR(ili->avdd))
> + return PTR_ERR(ili->avdd);
> +
> + ili->avee = devm_regulator_get(dev, "avee");
> + if (IS_ERR(ili->avee))
> + return PTR_ERR(ili->avee);
> +
> + ili->pp3300 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "pp3300");
> + if (IS_ERR(ili->pp3300))
> + return PTR_ERR(ili->pp3300);
> +
> + ili->pp1800 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "pp1800");
> + if (IS_ERR(ili->pp1800))
> + return PTR_ERR(ili->pp1800);
> +
> + ili->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(ili->enable_gpio)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot get reset-gpios %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(ili->enable_gpio));
> + return PTR_ERR(ili->enable_gpio);
> + }
> +
> + gpiod_set_value(ili->enable_gpio, 0);
> +
> + drm_panel_init(&ili->base, dev, &ili9882t_funcs,
> + DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI);
nit: the indentation of the above line isn't quite right. Just put the
whole drm_panel_init() on one line even if it's slightly over 80
characters long.
> +static void ili9882t_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + struct ili9882t *ili = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
> +
> + drm_panel_disable(&ili->base);
> + drm_panel_unprepare(&ili->base);
> +}
Please remove the "shutdown()" function. The above two calls to
drm_panel_disable() and drm_panel_unprepare() require that the panel
driver is tracking the "prepared" / "enabled" state and will trigger
warnings if you try shutting down while the panel was off.
We shouldn't need the shutdown functionality because all of the DRM
drivers that this panel is used together with should properly call
drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). For details, see the long discussion in
reply to my patch at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804140605.RFC.4.I930069a32baab6faf46d6b234f89613b5cec0f14@changeid
> +static void ili9882t_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + struct ili9882t *ili = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ili9882t_shutdown(dsi);
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to detach from DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + if (ili->base.dev)
> + drm_panel_remove(&ili->base);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ili9882t_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "starry,ili9882t",
> + .data = &starry_ili9882t_desc
> + },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ili9882t_of_match);
> +
> +static struct mipi_dsi_driver ili9882t_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "panel-ili9882t",
> + .of_match_table = ili9882t_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = ili9882t_probe,
> + .remove = ili9882t_remove,
> + .shutdown = ili9882t_shutdown,
> +};
> +module_mipi_dsi_driver(ili9882t_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Ilitek ILI9882T-based panels driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> \ No newline at end of file
Please make sure there's a newline at the end of the file so you don't
have the "No newline at end of file".
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list