[PATCH 05/10] drm/tests: Add test for drm_framebuffer_cleanup()

[Carlos]

Hi Maíra,

On 8/26/23 11:06, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> On 8/25/23 13:07, Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho wrote:
>> Add a single KUnit test case for the drm_framebuffer_cleanup function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcarlos at disroot.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
>> index 0e0e8216bbbc..16d9cf4bed88 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_framebuffer_test.c
>> @@ -370,6 +370,9 @@ static int drm_framebuffer_test_init(struct kunit 
>> *test)
>>       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, mock);
>>       dev = &mock->dev;
>>   +    mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
>
> What about drmm_mutex_init()?
I took a look into it and as far I understand it would be useful if
the drm_device was allocated with drmm_kalloc(), sure? As far we
are using kunit_kalloc here and the drm_device is automatically
deallocated when the test finishes, what would be the better by
using drmm_mutex_init?

It isn't that I don't wanna use it, I just didn't understand how
exactly it works and how could I use it in that code. Should I
replace the drm_device allocation to use drmm?

Thanks,
Carlos

> Best Regards,
> - Maíra
>
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.fb_list);
>> +    dev->mode_config.num_fb = 0;
>>       dev->mode_config.min_width = MIN_WIDTH;
>>       dev->mode_config.max_width = MAX_WIDTH;
>>       dev->mode_config.min_height = MIN_HEIGHT;
>> @@ -380,6 +383,14 @@ static int drm_framebuffer_test_init(struct 
>> kunit *test)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   +static void drm_framebuffer_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +    struct drm_mock *mock = test->priv;
>> +    struct drm_device *dev = &mock->dev;
>> +
>> +    mutex_destroy(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void drm_test_framebuffer_create(struct kunit *test)
>>   {
>>       const struct drm_framebuffer_test *params = test->param_value;
>> @@ -483,7 +494,44 @@ static void check_src_coords_test_to_desc(const 
>> struct check_src_coords_case *t,
>>   KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(check_src_coords, check_src_coords_cases,
>>             check_src_coords_test_to_desc);
>>   +static void drm_test_framebuffer_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +    struct drm_mock *mock = test->priv;
>> +    struct drm_device *dev = &mock->dev;
>> +    struct list_head *fb_list = &dev->mode_config.fb_list;
>> +    struct drm_framebuffer fb1 = { .dev = dev };
>> +    struct drm_framebuffer fb2 = { .dev = dev };
>> +
>> +    /* This must result on [fb_list] -> fb1 -> fb2 */
>> +    list_add_tail(&fb1.head, fb_list);
>> +    list_add_tail(&fb2.head, fb_list);
>> +    dev->mode_config.num_fb = 2;
>> +
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb_list->prev, &fb2.head);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb_list->next, &fb1.head);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb1.head.prev, fb_list);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb1.head.next, &fb2.head);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb2.head.prev, &fb1.head);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb2.head.next, fb_list);
>> +
>> +    drm_framebuffer_cleanup(&fb1);
>> +
>> +    /* Now [fb_list] -> fb2 */
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb_list->prev, &fb2.head);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb_list->next, &fb2.head);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb2.head.prev, fb_list);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, fb2.head.next, fb_list);
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, dev->mode_config.num_fb, 1);
>> +
>> +    drm_framebuffer_cleanup(&fb2);
>> +
>> +    /* Now fb_list is empty */
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, list_empty(fb_list));
>> +    KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, dev->mode_config.num_fb, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static struct kunit_case drm_framebuffer_tests[] = {
>> +    KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_cleanup),
>> KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_framebuffer_modifiers_not_supported),
>>       KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_framebuffer_check_src_coords, 
>> check_src_coords_gen_params),
>>       KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_framebuffer_create, 
>> drm_framebuffer_create_gen_params),
>> @@ -493,6 +541,7 @@ static struct kunit_case drm_framebuffer_tests[] = {
>>   static struct kunit_suite drm_framebuffer_test_suite = {
>>       .name = "drm_framebuffer",
>>       .init = drm_framebuffer_test_init,
>> +    .exit = drm_framebuffer_test_exit,
>>       .test_cases = drm_framebuffer_tests,
>>   };