On LinkedIn, I belong to the "Linux Users" and "Linux Experts" lists. We were having a discussion on "Linux Users" as to why corporations aren't moving to Linux desktops. Someone suggested a name like "Doors" or "Skylights" for a Linux distro to point out how 'similar Linux was to Windows'. I countered that perhaps we should market Linux as the "Low-e OS" because Linux is a "more energy-efficient, greener approach to computing than traditional Windows." Well, we could change that to KDE or Gnome and get away without paying Microsoft - especially since they cannot trademark the word "Windows" (although they did try).<br>
<br>Okay, just a thought that might have amused you for a second. I'll let you folks get back to work now. Lots of ground to cover in making Linux worthy for most desktop computers.<br>