<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=gb2312"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12"> <TITLE>Reply: Question on S3 on evergreen</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY>  Xav, thanks for your reminder. Actually our law leam has already checked the license. As Dave said, the DRM kernel driver is all MIT-licensed and we will be free to use them. When the drm uses linux kernel function calls, we will use freebsd(none-GPL) equivalent to replace. Dave, by the way, I want to ask you about some exceptions in DRM. you know in some files(i.e. drm_fb_helper.c), it includes MODULE_LICENSE("GPL and additional rights"). Does it mean it is GPL licensed? Is it free to use this file? Thanks, Frank -----Original Message----- From: Xavier Bestel [<A HREF="mailto:xavier.bestel@free.fr">mailto:xavier.bestel@free.fr</A>] Sent: 2011-10-13 (星期四) 20:07 To: Dave Airlie Cc: Huang, FrankR; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Question on S3 on evergreen On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:04 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 17:54 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: > >> [...] I have ported radeon_suspend_kms() and radeon_resume_kms() > >> functions from linux to CE. > > > > I imagine you already have checked with your company's lawyers, but if I > > understand correctly that means your drivers will be distributed under > > the GPL ? > > All the GPU driver code is licensed under MIT. Oh, I thought "linux" meant "kernel", not "X11".         Xav </BODY> </HTML>