<div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/30 Inki Dae <<a href="mailto:inki.dae@samsung.com" target="_blank">inki.dae@samsung.com</a>> <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"> Hello, all. This patch introduces reference count of gem object name and resolves the below issue. In case that proces A shares its own gem object with process B, process B opens a gem object name from process A to get its own gem handle. But if process A closes the gem handle, the gem object name to this is also released. So the gem object name that process B referring to becomes invalid. I'm not sure that this is issue or not but at least, gem object name IS NOT process-unique but IS gem object-unique. So I think the gem object name shared by process A should be preserved as long as the gem object has not been released. Below is simple example. at P1: 1. gem create => obj_refcount = 1 2. gem flink => obj_refcount = 2 (allocate obj_name) 5. gem close a. obj_refcount = 2 and release the obj_name b. obj_refcount = 1 once the obj_name release 3. and share it with P2 at P2: 4. gem open => obj_refcount = 3 6. the obj_name from P1 is invalid. 7. gem close => obj_refcount = 0(released) And with this patch, at P1: 1. gem create => obj_refcount = 1, name_refcount = 0 2. gem flink => obj_refcount = 2, name_refcount = 1 (allocate obj_name) 5. gem close => obj_refcount = 2, name_refcount = 1 3. and share it with P2 at P2: 4. gem open => obj_refcount = 3, name_refcount = 2 6. the gem object name from P1 is valid. 7. gem close a. obj_refcount = 1, name_refcount = 0(released) b. obj_refcount = 0(released) once name_ref_count = 0 There may be my missing point so please give me any advice. Thanks, Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <<a href="mailto:inki.dae@samsung.com">inki.dae@samsung.com</a>> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/drm/drmP.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c index 24efae4..16e4b75 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ int drm_gem_object_init(struct drm_device *dev, kref_init(&obj->refcount); atomic_set(&obj->handle_count, 0); + atomic_set(&obj->obj_name_count, 0); obj->size = size; return 0; @@ -166,6 +167,7 @@ int drm_gem_private_object_init(struct drm_device *dev, kref_init(&obj->refcount); atomic_set(&obj->handle_count, 0); + atomic_set(&obj->obj_name_count, 0); obj->size = size; return 0; @@ -452,6 +454,19 @@ drm_gem_flink_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return -ENOENT; again: + /* + * return current object name increasing reference count of + * this object name if exists already and not same process. + */ + if (obj->name) { + if (file_priv->pid != current->pid) </blockquote><div> </div><div>This condition should be removed and placed with another. It's my mistake.</div><div> </div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"> + atomic_inc(&obj->obj_name_count); + + args->name = (uint64_t)obj->name; + drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj); + return 0; + } + if (idr_pre_get(&dev->object_name_idr, GFP_KERNEL) == 0) { ret = -ENOMEM; goto err; @@ -461,6 +476,7 @@ again: if (!obj->name) { ret = idr_get_new_above(&dev->object_name_idr, obj, 1, &obj->name); + atomic_set(&obj->obj_name_count, 1); args->name = (uint64_t) obj->name; spin_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock); @@ -502,8 +518,11 @@ drm_gem_open_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, spin_lock(&dev->object_name_lock); obj = idr_find(&dev->object_name_idr, (int) args->name); - if (obj) + if (obj) { drm_gem_object_reference(obj); + if (file_priv->pid != current->pid) </blockquote><div> </div><div>ditto. For this, will re-send it.</div><div> </div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"> + atomic_inc(&obj->obj_name_count); + } spin_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock); if (!obj) return -ENOENT; @@ -612,9 +631,25 @@ void drm_gem_object_handle_free(struct drm_gem_object *obj) /* Remove any name for this object */ spin_lock(&dev->object_name_lock); if (obj->name) { - idr_remove(&dev->object_name_idr, obj->name); - obj->name = 0; + /* + * The name of this object could being referenced + * by another process so remove the name after checking + * the obj_name_count of this object. + */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&obj->obj_name_count)) { + idr_remove(&dev->object_name_idr, obj->name); + obj->name = 0; + } else { + /* + * this object name is being referenced by other yet + * so do not unreference this. + */ + spin_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock); + return; + } + spin_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock); + /* * The object name held a reference to this object, drop * that now. diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index fad21c9..27657b8 100644 --- a/include/drm/drmP.h +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h @@ -628,6 +628,18 @@ struct drm_gem_object { /** Handle count of this object. Each handle also holds a reference */ atomic_t handle_count; /* number of handles on this object */ + /* + * Name count of this object. + * + * This count is initialized as 0 with drm_gem_object_init or + * drm_gem_private_object_init call. After that, this count is + * increased if the name of this object exists already + * otherwise is set to 1 at flink. And finally, the name of + * this object will be released when this count reaches 0 + * by gem close. + */ + atomic_t obj_name_count; + /** Related drm device */ struct drm_device *dev; -- 1.7.4.1 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org">dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel</a> </blockquote></div>